27.01.2026
If Your CIO Isn’t at the Executive Table, Your University Is Taking a Risk
Universities don’t fail because their technology breaks.
They fail because their strategy ignores technology until it’s too late.
For years, Higher Education has treated IT as a delivery function – something to be consulted once the “real” decisions have been made. That mindset is now actively dangerous.
In today’s sector, digital strategy is institutional strategy. And any university that doesn’t have its CIO at the executive table is operating with a blind spot.
Every Strategic Challenge in HE Is Now a Digital One
Look at the pressures facing universities right now:
- Recruiting and retaining students in a hyper-competitive market
- Delivering flexible, hybrid, and international learning at scale
- Protecting research, IP, and student data from escalating cyber threats
- Generating insight from data to improve outcomes and efficiency
- Doing more with less in a financially constrained environment
None of these can be solved without technology. Yet many institutions still involve their CIO after priorities are set – when budgets are fixed and expectations are already misaligned.
That’s not strategic leadership. It’s avoidable risk.
Excluding the CIO Creates Expensive Problems
When technology leadership is absent from executive decision-making, the consequences are predictable:
- Transformation programmes that look compelling on paper but fail in delivery
- Fragmented systems bought in silos, driving cost and complexity
- Cyber resilience treated as an insurance policy rather than a core risk
- Data that exists everywhere, but informs nothing
These failures are rarely “IT problems”. They are governance failures.
The CIO Role Has Changed – Governance Hasn’t Kept Up
The modern CIO is no longer a systems custodian. They are:
- Accountable for cyber security and institutional resilience
- Responsible for the digital student and staff experience
- Leading enterprise-wide change and cultural transformation
- Shaping major investment decisions and long-term capability
In any other sector, this would automatically warrant executive representation. In Higher Education, it is still debated.
That hesitation is costing institutions time, money, and momentum.
Digital Is Where Strategy Succeeds… or Fails
Universities that adapt quickly, scale innovation, and remain resilient tend to share one thing in common: technology leadership is embedded in the core of decision-making.
Where CIOs sit at the executive table, institutions move faster, invest more wisely, and avoid the disconnect between ambition and delivery that undermines so many transformation initiatives.
Where they don’t, digital becomes a constraint – not an enabler.
What Message Are You Sending?
Keeping the CIO out of the executive team sends a clear signal:
- That digital capability is secondary
- That transformation is someone else’s problem
- That technology teams exist to react, not to lead
In a sector already struggling with pace and complexity, this is a message universities can no longer afford to send.
This Isn’t About Status, It’s About Survival
Giving the CIO a seat at the executive table isn’t about modernising job titles or keeping up with peers. It’s about whether institutions are structured to succeed in a digital-first world.
If universities expect technology to underpin growth, resilience, and student success, then technology leadership must be present where the most consequential decisions are made.
Because in Higher Education today, excluding the CIO from executive leadership isn’t neutral – it’s a strategic gamble.
